'Descartes ; Hume’s Theory on Knowledge\r'

'Knowledge is the things that unmatched has taken into itself and made the decision to believe that it is true. This leads to the question, what makes certain obtained pieces of association true? Descartes would disbelieve everything until he came to an absolute and undeniable truth. If he had completely reason to uncertainty something, it could not be true cognition. Descartes past discovered nonp beil thing that he could not interrogationfulness and that is â€Å"I think, thitherfore I am. ” He says that if he can think, then he knows that he exists. I equip and disagree with Rene Descartes theory of how we see knowledge.Just because you gestate doubt about something does not necessarily think of there is no knowledge of it. What one whitethorn doubt, another individual may subscribe knowledge of. So is that person’s knowledge false? I say no. There be many situations like that. One may doubt the existence of God, but I do not doubt it. Since we a ll have our give beliefs, it does not miserly one is wrong. So I do not agree with him saying there is no knowledge of things that he has the slightest doubt about. I do agree with his renowned line â€Å"I think, therefore I am. ” If one has the brain activity to think, then yes they do exist and that is certain.Since I am thinking, then I do have knowledge that I certainly exist. On the other hand, if one is in a asphyxia then I up to now do believe that they exist. If you are living, brisk and your heart is beating then you without doubt exist even though you are not really thinking. One in a coma does have the power to think once out of the coma so therefore they still exist. Hume was an empiricist and he believed that all knowledge watch overs through and through experience. If you requirement to know anything about what the world is like, you have to go out and explore; you cannot obviously sit, think really hard and promise to come up with knowledge.He believe d, along with the concomitant that knowledge is let outed through experience, that a persons experiences are nothing more than the subjects of his or her own perception. The knowledge of anything comes from the way it is notice through the five senses. Hume began to differentiate among feelings and thoughts. Feelings are only impressions made upon the body, and thoughts move in from impressions; meaning you cannot have feelings on things you have not experienced. I do agree that one can clear knowledge through experiences, but also through being taught what we learn in train.In put together for us to be taught things in school one had to experience the scientific study, math equation or whatever the framework consisted of. People did not just come up with these facts on his/her own. They spent a lot of time researching and experiencing them to gain knowledge about whatever they learned. We do gain knowledge from things we experience on our own as well. The saying â€Å"Pe ople learn from their mistakes” is the perfect example. A child tinctes a hot stove and burns their hand, in doing so; they learn not to touch it because they will remember what happened. In this case, they do learn from an experience.\r\n'